Friday, September 20, 2013
Law, Gospel, and the Book of Numbers
The book of Numbers begins at Mount Sinai and tells the story of Israel moving into the Promised Land, but we quickly run into a problem. Israel refused to invade the Promised Land because they were afraid of the inhabitants. The descendants of Anak (Nephilim) were there as well as many other strong tribes (Num 13:28-29). However, in Numbers 14:11-12 God gives the true reason why Israel failed to invade the land: the people despised God. They had no faith and would not trust and believe His promises. This reason has interesting implications on the perceived dichotomy of Grace vs. Law.
Many people try to understand the new covenant under Jesus as a ‘covenant of grace’ and the old covenant as a ‘covenant of law.’ This may suggest that God’s requirements for his people are vastly different in the old and new covenants. However, It is important to remember that God has always saved people by grace through faith, even in the old covenant: Abraham “believed the LORD, and he counted it to him as righteousness” (Gen 15:6).
What’s happening in Numbers 14, then? God is angry with his people because they do not have faith. Their lack of faith leads to their breaking of the law, and God’s law condemns those who don’t have faith. In contrast, Caleb and Joshua demonstrate the true faith God requires in his people. Upon their arrival from spying the land, they tell Moses, “If the Lord delights in us, he will bring us into this land to give it to us...do not fear the people of the land...the LORD is with us, do not fear them” (Num 14:8-9).
When wrestling with questions of Grace vs. Law, we ought to move beyond the question of 'what must I do to be saved' and answer the question of 'what does the Lord require.' Often times, well-meaning, God-fearing Christians are really good at answering the former question and forget to wrestle with the latter.
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Justin Martyr on Baptism
In reading through Justin Martyr's First Apology written to Emperor Titus, I came across his high view of Baptism. I find it interesting that a man who lived right after the Apostolic Fathers would have such a differing view of the efficacy of Baptism than us Moderns. I have been studying Baptism off and on for a few years and am curious to discover the changes that have occurred to the doctrine of Baptism in the history of the Church. How do those changes in doctrine play out in changing our culture? History can be a hard teacher. I have his words below for reflection:
"Those that are persuaded and believe that the things we say are true, and promise that they can live accordingly, are instructed to pray and beseech God with fasting for the remission of their past sins, while we pray and fast along with them. Then they are brought by us where there is water, and are reborn by the same manner of rebirth by which we ourselves were reborn; for they are then washed in the water in the name of God the Father and Master of all, and of our savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit. For Christ said, 'Unless you are born again you will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.'"
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Television and the Need to Grow Up
We live in a culture that doesn't know how to grow up. It's all around us; we're swimming it. It's especially obvious in our television shows. A friend of mine recently wrote a blog addressing this specific problem. She calls it the Peter Pan Syndrome. I was thinking about this and reflecting on a few of the shows on TV that I really like. Though great television, most of these shows support this view. Here's a list of a few men that suffer from the Peter Pan Syndrome.
What can I say about The Office? It kept a smile on my face for nine years...that's what she said. I can always watch an episode and be happy. However, where Jim and Pam characterize a healthy marriage that's worth fighting for, Michael Scott characterizes the boy who refuses to grow up. Or rather, the boy who doesn't know how to grow up. Or maybe even still, the boy who doesn't know that he needs to grow up. Of course, in the end he is redeemed through his relationship with Holly (and the people rejoice...), but for most of his screen time, he is the consummate child.
I love Psych; it's one of my favorite shows. I Can't get enough of all the '80's references. However, Shawn certainly suffers from the Peter Pan Syndrome. Shawn is afraid to grow up and marry his girlfriend. Instead, Shawn would rather spend his days playing silly games with his best friend, Gus. Pop goes the culture.
Do I really need to comment on this show? Hey I have an idea, let's have a show where we broadcast a man engaging in multiple realationships and affairs at the same time, and we'll pretend like it's dating and it's moving toward marriage. This show really is a great reflection of our culture. Next

Michael Scott, The Office
Shawn Spencer, Psych
The Bachelor
Doctor Who
Three cheers for the good doctor. As great as he is at saving the world, his relationships are bit too wibbly wobbly timey wimey. This is a man who has been around through eleven incarnations, travels with multiple companions, nearly falls in love with every one, and still refuses to marry. For awhile, he was even traveling with a bisexual Captain. Eventually though, he does get married to a fellow time traveler, so it all works out in the end, right? I wish could say that. He has left plenty of broken hearts in his wake.
I'm not trying to ruin TV for you, but if I did that's fine too. It is important to take a step back from time to time to see the state of things. Remember, TV, movies, and music is not created in a vacuum. They will always reflect the culture from which it comes. Does our culture need an overhaul? Absolutely.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
The Christian "Right?"
The common political discourse today in America demands the rights of every citizen. The lines begin to blur when we start elevating other's rights above some. Should law abiding citizens be allowed to carry guns? Should criminals? Let it be said now that I am thinking out loud in this blog and am open to correction.
What are our rights, then? Some might look to the Bill of Rights, and that is a good and proper thing for an American to do. We should know our heritage. It is important to remember, though, that America was not founded on strict Christian principles. Yes, there were many Christians who led the War for Independence against Britain, and there were many good Christians who signed the Declaration of Independence and even drafted the Bill of Rights. But, just because Christian men were involved in creating these documents, it does not follow that these documents are uniquely Christian. Many of our founding fathers were Deists - they believed in an immutable Creator, but unlike the Trinitarian Christian God Jehovah, this creator does not take much of an interest in our personal lives. The Deist god is the great Unmoved Mover that Aristotle taught.
Before my Christian friends get mad at me I'm going to explain myself. America is a wonderful nation and I'm thankful to have been born and raised here. But, the founding of America is the result of Christians and Deists working together. This is why there are many great Christian principles found in our founding documents, and also why there is a lot of Enlightenment influence as well.
So, back to my main point - what are our rights? As Christians, we should always consult what the Bible has to say about our rights. Strangely enough, from my studies in the the Good Book, we see that God does not give people rights the way we have defined rights in America. The Bible does not speak in this language. Our things, money, and time all belong to God. We do not have rights; instead, we have responsibilities to God and to each other.
How does this play out? Do I have a biblical right to own, keep, and bear arms? I do not think so. Instead, I have a God given responsibility to defend my family. Therefore, in order to fulfill this responsibility, I should own a weapon. Here's a hot topic right now - marriage equality. I do not have the right to marry whomever I am in love with. No, but to the woman God has called for me, He has given me a responsibility to marry, love, and defend her. God has called us to love Him with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength; and to the responsibility to love our neighbor as ourself. If Christians started thinking in these categories, imagine what would happen.
Before my Christian friends get mad at me I'm going to explain myself. America is a wonderful nation and I'm thankful to have been born and raised here. But, the founding of America is the result of Christians and Deists working together. This is why there are many great Christian principles found in our founding documents, and also why there is a lot of Enlightenment influence as well.
So, back to my main point - what are our rights? As Christians, we should always consult what the Bible has to say about our rights. Strangely enough, from my studies in the the Good Book, we see that God does not give people rights the way we have defined rights in America. The Bible does not speak in this language. Our things, money, and time all belong to God. We do not have rights; instead, we have responsibilities to God and to each other.
How does this play out? Do I have a biblical right to own, keep, and bear arms? I do not think so. Instead, I have a God given responsibility to defend my family. Therefore, in order to fulfill this responsibility, I should own a weapon. Here's a hot topic right now - marriage equality. I do not have the right to marry whomever I am in love with. No, but to the woman God has called for me, He has given me a responsibility to marry, love, and defend her. God has called us to love Him with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength; and to the responsibility to love our neighbor as ourself. If Christians started thinking in these categories, imagine what would happen.
Thursday, May 23, 2013
5 Things I Learned as a First Year Teacher
Th following list is a few of my thoughts and insights I had over this past school year. In no particular order:
1. High School girls are stuck in a perpetual state of Disney Princess Fantasy (DPF). I’m not talking about the good theme of “kill the dragon, save the princess.” That’s the Christian theme; it’s what Jesus does for His church. I’m talking about the love for everything Disney. If you suffer from Disney Princess Fantasy your symptoms may include singing Disney songs, creating lists of which Disney princesses would fare better in a given situation, singing Disney songs, drawing your favorite princess, singing more Disney songs, and dressing up like your favorite Disney princess. This is a phenomena I have noticed in the majority of the female population. I’m not saying that DPF is a bad thing, it’s just strange.
2. When Second grade girls put on a ring pop, they begin fantasizing about marriage. When Second grade boys put on a ring pop, it just becomes a weapon to punch the other boys. Are you seeing a theme about girls developing? From a young age they want to be that princess I mentioned above. Boys don’t care much for royalty though, they just want to wrestle. Which leads me to my next point.

4. I’m selfish. Moving on...
5. Children have a way of capturing your heart. My favorite grades to teach are first and second grades. I realized this past week that with the school year coming to a close I may never see some of those children ever again. I'm really going to miss those kids.
Monday, May 6, 2013
Raising Worshippers, Part 2 of a Series on Education
In my first blog I argued for movement toward a liturgical education, an education based on worship, because God desires worshippers. I'd like to submit a few ideas on why and how we can incorporate worshipping opportunities in an education. I'd like to thank James Jordan for an essay he wrote that inspired some of these thoughts.
First, our bodies are musical instruments. When I talk I make percussive sounds using my lips and tongue, my vocal folds are strings in my throat, and no sound will come out if I don't exhale wind. A musical education ought to train these parts of our bodies for worship to God.
Second, music education is trinitarian. The third person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit, is the Music of God. What does the Holy Spirit do? He glorifies the Son, the Word (logos) of God. Therefore, music is the glorification of language. I can speak to you in my normal voice or I can sing/chant to you. The latter is going to help you remember what I said; I'm glorifying my speech.
First, our bodies are musical instruments. When I talk I make percussive sounds using my lips and tongue, my vocal folds are strings in my throat, and no sound will come out if I don't exhale wind. A musical education ought to train these parts of our bodies for worship to God.
Second, music education is trinitarian. The third person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit, is the Music of God. What does the Holy Spirit do? He glorifies the Son, the Word (logos) of God. Therefore, music is the glorification of language. I can speak to you in my normal voice or I can sing/chant to you. The latter is going to help you remember what I said; I'm glorifying my speech.
Ok, so how can we create worshippers? It's not hard if we make time for worship every day. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we start our day with at least a 30 minute worship service where we sing Psalms and psalm like hymns, read Proverbs, and pray? If we follow this consistently a child can have all 150 Psalms memorized by the time he's a teenager, and probably the book of Proverbs, too.
But, we don't stop there because the Bible tells us to praise him with instruments (Psalm 150). A good music teacher can teach young kids a variety of instruments. Let's enroll our kids in violin and piano lessons and guitar and drum lessons. We do this so they can be better worshippers, not because it will help them achieve better math scores - though it will.
Every teenager should be in choir all four years of high school, just as they should study the great Christian writers like Shakespeare, Milton, Dante, and Jane Austen all four years. They should be in a good choir, a choir that will introduce them to the works of the great Christian composers. Our teenagers should be saturated with the counterpoint of Bach and the beauty of Handel and understand the old plainsong melodies of the Medieval period.
Every teenager should be in choir all four years of high school, just as they should study the great Christian writers like Shakespeare, Milton, Dante, and Jane Austen all four years. They should be in a good choir, a choir that will introduce them to the works of the great Christian composers. Our teenagers should be saturated with the counterpoint of Bach and the beauty of Handel and understand the old plainsong melodies of the Medieval period.
This is our foundation on which to build. This can be done right along your current curriculum.
Thursday, May 2, 2013
I'm Coming Out Straight!
I can understand why it used to be considered courageous to come out of the closet and claim homosexuality. A person could be thoroughly persecuted for their sexual choice. In today's world, however, that no longer applies. In fact, it seems that our culture hopes that everyone will be gay. This view does not bode well for the perpetuation of humanity.
I’m coming out straight! I'm still straight and plan on remaining straight forever. Being straight is the truly courageous choice. I plan to marry one woman, love and serve her until we die, protect her, and fight off any other temptresses that would want to draw me away from her. Eventually, we will have children which requires a whole new level of courage. I will have to feed them and protect them, train them and disciple them. And, as their father, God will hold me responsible for how they turn out.
So, which is the truly courageous choice, coming out of the closet or reaffirming my heterosexuality? The choice is clear. I’m coming out straight!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)